How to Write Better Than AI and ChatGPT

24 Apr 202304:49

TLDRThis video script challenges the notion that AI will replace human writers, highlighting the unique advantages of human authorship such as personal touch, first-hand experiences, and the ability to create original content. It suggests leveraging AI as a writing assistant, recommending a collaborative approach where humans provide the outline and AI expands on it. The video emphasizes the importance of useful, actionable content and personal viewpoints in writing, reassuring viewers that AI is not a perfect substitute for human creativity and expertise.


  • ๐Ÿ™‚ AI is perceived as a potential replacement for humans in various tasks, but this video argues against that notion for writing.
  • ๐Ÿ“ The speaker emphasizes the importance of personal touch, showing over telling, and leveraging first-hand experiences to outshine AI-generated content.
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Highlighting the differences between AI and human writing, the video points out that AI lacks personal experiences and often produces generic content.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ Encourages leveraging AI as a writing assistant rather than a replacement, suggesting a collaborative approach to content creation.
  • ๐Ÿ“š Discusses the importance of producing useful, actionable content and asks specific questions to guide writers towards creating valuable work.
  • ๐Ÿง Stresses the value of originality in writing, noting that AI can only replicate existing ideas, while humans can create new and impactful ones.
  • ๐Ÿ™‹โ€โ™‚๏ธ Addresses common pitfalls in AI writing, such as lack of coherence and depth, and offers strategies to overcome them.
  • ๐Ÿ’ก Shares a personal anecdote to illustrate the effectiveness of human-driven content strategy, specifically in the context of growing a freelance business.
  • ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Suggests that by asking critical questions about the truth, importance, expression, and originality of their content, writers can significantly improve their work.
  • ๐Ÿ“ฒ Concludes with a reflection on the uncertain future of AI replacing humans in creative tasks but maintains a hopeful perspective for writers.

Q & A

  • What is the main argument the speaker makes about AI and its impact on human writers?

    -The speaker argues that despite the rise of AI like ChatGPT, human writers still hold an important place as they bring personal experiences, expertise, and originality to their writing, which AI cannot replicate.

  • How does the speaker describe the initial response from ChatGPT on publishing a guest blog post?

    -The speaker describes the initial response from ChatGPT as generic and lacking in practical value, emphasizing the need for a more personalized and actionable approach.

  • What makes a human-written article more appealing than AI-generated content according to the speaker?

    -The speaker believes that human-written articles are more appealing due to their personal touch, expertise, and the ability to share first-hand experiences, which helps in building trust and connection with the readers.

  • What is the significance of first-hand experiences in writing, as mentioned in the script?

    -First-hand experiences are significant in writing because they provide authentic and valuable insights that AI, which can only reference others' content, cannot offer. This gives human writers an advantage in creating impactful and relatable content.

  • What are the four key questions writers should ask themselves about their content, as suggested by Paul Graham?

    -The four key questions are: (1) Is the point you're making true? (2) Is it important and does the audience know this already? (3) Is it expressed in the strongest possible way? (4) Is this original content?

  • How does the speaker propose the use of AI as a writing assistant?

    -The speaker suggests using AI as a tool to expand on the main points outlined by the writer, rather than generating entire articles. This collaborative approach allows the writer to maintain control and leverage AI's capabilities to enhance their work.

  • What additional question does the speaker propose to Paul Graham's list for writers?

    -The speaker proposes an additional question: 'Do all parts flow well together?' to emphasize the importance of coherence and structure in writing.

  • Why does the speaker believe that AI-generated content tends to be 'vanilla'?

    -AI-generated content tends to be 'vanilla' because it is programmed to avoid controversy and not to offend anyone, which can result in generic and less impactful content.

  • How does the speaker suggest writers ensure their content is useful and actionable?

    -The speaker suggests that writers should focus on providing valuable information, actionable insights, and ensure that their points are connected and flow well together to create content that is both useful and engaging.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the possibility of humans being replaced by machines in the future?

    -The speaker acknowledges the possibility but emphasizes that as of the current moment, human writers still hold unique advantages over AI and are not yet replaceable.

  • What is the speaker's advice to writers regarding the use of AI?

    -The speaker advises writers to use AI as a complement to their abilities, leveraging it for its strengths while maintaining their unique human qualities such as personal experiences, original ideas, and actionable content.



๐Ÿค– Debunking AI Replacement Myths

The paragraph introduces the video's theme, which challenges the notion that AI, like ChatGPT, will replace human writers. It critiques a generic response from ChatGPT on how to publish a guest blog post and asserts that human creativity and experience offer unique value that AI cannot replicate. The speaker aims to provide strategies to enhance writing quality over AI-generated content.

๐Ÿ‘ค The Power of Personal Touch

This section emphasizes the importance of a personal touch in content creation. It argues that people prefer to follow individuals rather than bots and highlights the authenticity that human influencers and content creators bring. The comparison between AI-generated content and a human-written article illustrates how personal experiences and expertise can make content more relatable and valuable.

๐Ÿ“š Show, Don't Tell

The paragraph discusses the concept of 'showing and not telling' by advocating for content that demonstrates expertise through real-life experiences. It contrasts AI's limitation to reference others' content with the ability of human writers to share first-hand experiences, which are deemed more credible and impactful. The example of a writer's journey from zero to a six-figure income within a year is used to illustrate this point.

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Creating Actionable Content

This part of the script focuses on the importance of producing useful and actionable content. It references writer Paul Graham's views on content usefulness and poses four questions that writers should consider to improve their work. These questions address the truthfulness, importance, strength, and originality of the content. The paragraph also suggests that AI struggles with providing sources and creating strong, opinionated content, which are areas where human writers excel.

๐ŸŒŸ Enhancing AI's Output

The final paragraph discusses how AI can be effectively used as a tool to complement human writing abilities. It suggests using AI for expanding on pre-planned outlines rather than generating entire articles from a single prompt. This approach allows for a collaboration between the writer and AI, where the writer maintains control over the content's direction and quality, ensuring a more personalized and impactful output.




Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to think and learn like humans. In the video, AI is contrasted with human writers, highlighting the limitations of AI in producing content that can match the depth and personal touch of human writing.


ChatGPT is an AI language model developed by OpenAI that generates human-like text based on the prompts given to it. In the context of the video, ChatGPT is used as an example to illustrate the capabilities and shortcomings of AI in content creation compared to human writers.

๐Ÿ’กHuman Writers

Human writers are individuals who create content using their own thoughts, experiences, and creativity. The video emphasizes the unique advantages of human writers, such as the ability to provide personal perspectives, first-hand experiences, and original ideas, which AI cannot replicate.


Personality refers to the distinct set of characteristics, traits, and behaviors that define an individual. In the video, the personality of a writer is highlighted as a crucial element that makes their content more relatable and engaging to readers, something that AI lacks.


Experience refers to the knowledge or skill obtained through involvement in or exposure to events. The video underscores the importance of writers drawing from their own experiences to create content that is valuable and authentic, a dimension that AI, lacking personal experiences, cannot provide.


Usefulness pertains to the quality of being practical or beneficial to the reader. The video emphasizes that content should not just be informative but also actionable, providing readers with clear takeaways or solutions they can apply.


Originality refers to the quality of being new, fresh, or inventive. In the context of the video, original content is what sets human writers apart from AI, as it allows them to introduce unique ideas and perspectives that can potentially influence or change people's lives.

๐Ÿ’กWriting Assistants

Writing assistants are tools or platforms, like AI models, designed to aid writers in their creative process. The video suggests that AI should be viewed as a complementary tool to writers rather than a replacement, helping to expand on the writer's initial ideas and structure.

๐Ÿ’กContent Creation

Content creation involves the production of various forms of content, such as articles, videos, or podcasts, to communicate information or ideas. The video discusses the importance of human elements in content creation, which AI cannot fully replicate, to make the content more impactful and relatable.


Fact-checking is the process of verifying the accuracy of information presented in a piece of writing or speech. In the video, fact-checking is highlighted as a critical practice for writers to ensure the reliability of their content, something that AI lacks due to its inability to provide sources or firsthand experiences.


Co-creation refers to the collaborative process of creating something new, where different parties contribute their unique strengths and ideas. In the context of the video, co-creation is suggested as a way for writers to use AI to enhance their work by providing expansions on their outlined ideas, rather than relying solely on AI-generated content.


AI's impact on writing and its potential to replace human authors is being questioned.

The video aims to demonstrate how human writers can outperform AI tools like ChatGPT in creating content.

ChatGPT's response to publishing a guest blog post is deemed generic and not very useful.

The importance of personal touch in writing is emphasized, which AI lacks.

Showing versus telling is highlighted, with a preference for expert sharing of valuable, experience-based information.

AI's inability to have first-hand experiences is contrasted with the value of human experiences in writing.

The usefulness of content is stressed over persuasiveness, according to writer Paul Graham.

Four key questions are proposed for writers to consider to improve their content over AI-generated text.

The necessity of accurate and well-researched content is underlined as a way to outperform AI.

Writers are encouraged to focus on the importance and originality of their topics.

AI's tendency to produce generic and non-offensive content is discussed.

The importance of bold and opinionated content for making an impact on readers is highlighted.

Original ideas and the potential to change lives through writing are emphasized as human advantages.

A suggestion to improve AI-generated content by using it as a writing assistant for expanding on pre-planned points.

AI's role as a complement rather than a replacement for human writers is established.

The video concludes that humans are not replaced by machines in writing today, leveraging AI's capabilities.