Midjourney vs Leonardo AI- Battle of the Image Generators!

AI World
25 Dec 202319:37

TLDRIn this video, Midjourney and Leonardo AI go head-to-head in a battle of image generation capabilities. The platforms are tested across various use cases including image to image creation, logo generation, and generating realistic humans or consistent characters. Viewers will learn the strengths and weaknesses of each tool to make informed decisions for their projects. Midjourney is favored for its realistic style and customization, while Leonardo AI is praised for its user-friendly interface and logo generation capabilities. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the user's project.


  • 😀 Midjourney and Leonardo AI are two image generators being compared in a head-to-head test.
  • 🔍 The comparison includes image to image creation, logo generation, realistic human depiction, and consistent character maintenance.
  • 🏁 The goal is to help viewers decide which generator to use for their next project based on strengths and weaknesses.
  • 📝 The first test uses a Grand Canyon image to see how well each generator can create a similar image without a reference image.
  • 🏆 Midjourney performed better in the first test, scoring a 7 out of 10 compared to Leonardo's 5.
  • ⚡ Leonardo has a user-friendly interface and is significantly faster in generating images.
  • 🎨 Midjourney allows for more customization with features like the style tuner for unique visual styles.
  • 🤖 In logo generation, both platforms produced high-quality results, but Leonardo was more user-friendly and faster.
  • 👤 When generating images of people, Leonardo produced more realistic results and adhered better to negative prompts to avoid distortions.
  • 🎭 For consistent character generation, Midjourney did a better job, especially when using its own style tuner.
  • 💰 Midjourney requires a subscription starting at $10 a month, while Leonardo AI offers free access for a limited number of daily generations.
  • 📈 The choice between Leonardo AI and Midjourney depends on the specific needs of the project, such as realism, customization, or simplicity and cost.

Q & A

  • What is the main purpose of the video comparing Midjourney and Leonardo AI?

    -The main purpose of the video is to put Midjourney and Leonardo AI head-to-head to see which image generator performs better across common use cases such as image to image creation, logo generation, generating realistic humans, and maintaining consistent characters.

  • How does the video test the basic prompt capabilities of Leonardo AI and Midjourney?

    -The video tests the basic prompt capabilities by using the same Grand Canyon image as a reference and asking both AIs to generate an image similar to it without uploading the reference image.

  • What is the user-friendly interface advantage that Leonardo AI has over Midjourney?

    -Leonardo AI has a user-friendly interface that allows users to easily pick and adjust things using their cursor, unlike Midjourney which requires users to type everything out on Discord.

  • Which image generator was faster in generating images in the video comparison?

    -Leonardo AI was faster in generating images, taking about 13 seconds compared to Midjourney which took around 51 seconds.

  • What feature does Midjourney offer that allows users to customize their own visual style?

    -Midjourney offers a style tuner feature that allows users to craft their own unique visual style and apply it to any or potentially all the images they generate on the platform.

  • How does Leonardo AI handle the image-to-image feature compared to Midjourney?

    -Leonardo AI handles the image-to-image feature with less complexity during the generation process, making it easier for users compared to Midjourney.

  • What is the scoring given by the video to Midjourney and Leonardo AI for the first image prompt test?

    -For the first image prompt test, Midjourney received a score of seven out of 10, while Leonardo scored a modest five.

  • Which platform was better at generating high-resolution images in the video's comparison?

    -Both platforms managed to produce high-resolution images, but Leonardo AI excelled in terms of resolution and speed.

  • How does the video compare the logo generation capabilities of Leonardo AI and Midjourney?

    -The video compares the logo generation capabilities by asking both platforms to recreate the channel's logo and then enhancing it using the image-to-image feature, with Leonardo AI being the best choice for generating logos.

  • What is the verdict of the video on generating consistent characters using Midjourney and Leonardo AI?

    -The video concludes that Midjourney did a much better job at generating consistent characters compared to both methods used by Leonardo AI.

  • What is the final recommendation of the video regarding the use of Leonardo AI and Midjourney for different projects?

    -The final recommendation is that if you're aiming for a more realistic style and are willing to customize your own tuner, Midjourney is the better choice. However, if you're a business owner looking to design a logo, Leonardo AI is highly recommended.



🤖 AI Image Generation Comparison

This paragraph introduces a head-to-head comparison between two AI image generation platforms, Mid Journey and Leonardo AI. The goal is to evaluate which platform performs better across various use cases such as image-to-image creation, logo generation, and maintaining consistent characters. The video aims to help viewers decide which AI to use for their next project by providing insights into each platform's strengths and weaknesses. The first test involves generating an image of the Grand Canyon without uploading a reference image, using descriptive prompts to guide the AIs. The paragraph concludes with a brief mention of a tutorial for mastering Leonardo and a teaser for the comparison results.


🎨 Testing Image-to-Image Features

The second paragraph delves into the image-to-image feature comparison of Mid Journey and Leonardo AI. It describes the process of using prompts to generate images with specific themes, such as placing Open AI CEO Sam Altman in a scene with tigers. The paragraph explains how to use Mid Journey's style tuner to create a unique visual style and apply it to generated images. It also details the steps for creating a style tuner in Leonardo AI and compares the results and user experience of both platforms. The summary includes the time taken for image generation and the resolution quality, with Mid Journey scoring higher in this round due to its more realistic output.


🏆 Logo Generation and Enhancement

This paragraph focuses on testing the logo generation capabilities of both platforms. The challenge involves recreating a channel's logo and enhancing an existing logo with additional elements. The process of generating logos on Leonardo AI is highlighted for its user-friendly interface and the ability to train a model using community logo models. Mid Journey's approach to enhancing logos is also discussed. The paragraph concludes with a comparison of the two platforms, noting that Leonardo AI is faster and more user-friendly, while Mid Journey offers a more artistic outcome.


👤 Consistent Character Generation

The final paragraph examines the ability of both AI platforms to generate consistent characters, a crucial feature for creating comics or storybooks. It outlines the steps for creating a consistent character in Mid Journey, including setting up a character named Ruby and testing her consistency across different prompts and settings. Leonardo AI's methods for achieving character consistency are also explored, with a comparison of a straightforward prompt-based approach and a more complex fine-tuning model training process. The paragraph concludes with a summary of the results, favoring Mid Journey for its higher precision and Leonardo AI for its simplicity and speed.




Midjourney is an AI-driven image generator that creates images based on textual prompts. It is one of the two main subjects in the video, where it is compared with Leonardo AI. The video demonstrates how Midjourney performs in various image generation tasks, such as creating images from prompts, enhancing logos, and generating consistent characters. It is noted for its ability to produce realistic images and for allowing users to customize their visual style, although it is also mentioned as being less user-friendly and requiring a subscription.

💡Leonardo AI

Leonardo AI is another AI image generator featured in the video, competing with Midjourney in terms of image creation capabilities. It is highlighted for its user-friendly interface and faster image generation speed. The video compares Leonardo AI's performance in tasks such as image to image creation, logo generation, and maintaining consistent characters. Leonardo AI is praised for its ease of use and free access, making it a recommended choice for business owners looking to design logos.

💡Image Generators

Image generators are AI tools that create visual content based on textual descriptions or prompts. The video's main theme revolves around comparing two image generators, Midjourney and Leonardo AI, across different use cases. These tools are significant in the context of the video as they represent the latest advancements in AI-driven content creation, offering users various applications such as logo design, character creation for stories, and more.


In the context of AI image generation, prompts are textual descriptions provided to the AI to guide the creation of an image. The video script describes how different prompts are used to test the capabilities of Midjourney and Leonardo AI, such as generating a Grand Canyon image or creating a logo. The effectiveness of the image generators is judged based on how well they interpret and translate these prompts into visual content.

💡Image to Image

The term 'image to image' refers to a feature in AI image generators where the AI creates a new image based on an existing image and a textual prompt. The video tests this feature by asking both Midjourney and Leonardo AI to generate images of a person with tigers around them, using a photo of Sam Altman as a reference. This feature is crucial for assessing how well each AI can interpret and integrate visual and textual information.


Logos are symbolic designs used by companies and organizations to represent their brand. The video discusses the ability of both Midjourney and Leonardo AI to generate logos based on textual prompts. It is highlighted that Leonardo AI offers a more user-friendly experience and is recommended for business owners looking to create logos, while Midjourney provides a more customizable and realistic style.

💡Realistic Humans

Generating realistic images of humans is a challenge for AI image generators, as it requires capturing accurate facial features and expressions. The video script describes a test where both Midjourney and Leonardo AI are tasked with creating an image of Elon Musk. The results are evaluated based on how closely the generated images resemble the real person, with Leonardo AI's output being considered more realistic.

💡Consistent Characters

Consistent characters refer to the ability of an AI to generate images of the same character with consistent features across different prompts or images. The video demonstrates this by showing how Midjourney and Leonardo AI can create and maintain consistent characters for use in comics or storybooks. Midjourney is noted for doing a better job in this area, providing a more reliable output for character consistency.

💡User-Friendly Interface

A user-friendly interface is a design aspect that allows users to interact with a system easily and intuitively. The video contrasts the interfaces of Midjourney and Leonardo AI, with Leonardo AI being praised for its ease of use. This is important for users who may not be as technically inclined or who prefer a more straightforward approach to generating images.


A subscription model is a type of payment arrangement where users pay a recurring fee to access a service or product. In the context of the video, Midjourney operates on a subscription basis, starting at $10 a month. This is in contrast to Leonardo AI, which offers free access for a limited number of image generations per day. The subscription model is a consideration for users deciding which image generator to use based on cost and the extent of their usage.


Midjourney and Leonardo AI are compared in a head-to-head battle for image generation supremacy.

Both image generators are tested across common use cases such as image to image creation, logo generation, and generating realistic humans.

Midjourney and Leonardo AI are evaluated on their ability to generate images from basic prompts without a reference image.

Leonardo's interface is praised for its user-friendliness, allowing easy adjustments with a cursor.

Midjourney's process involves typing out detailed prompts with specific syntax for image generation.

Midjourney's generated image is more aligned with the Grand Canyon prompt compared to Leonardo's attempt.

Leonardo is noted for its speed, generating images almost five times faster than Midjourney.

Midjourney introduces a style tuner feature for crafting unique visual styles.

Leonardo's image to image feature is tested with a photo of Sam Altman and the prompt of tigers in the forest.

Midjourney's style tuner is shown to be effective in creating stylized images based on user preferences.

Leonardo's logo generation capabilities are tested and compared to Midjourney's results.

Leonardo is recommended for business owners looking to design logos due to its ease of use and speed.

Midjourney's image enhancement feature is demonstrated with a logo, showing intriguing and interesting results.

Leonardo's image enhancement feature is shown to maintain artistic integrity and simplicity.

Midjourney and Leonardo are tested on generating non-image to image human prompts with a focus on realism.

Leonardo's generated image of Elon Musk is considered more realistic and impressive than Midjourney's.

Midjourney's method for creating consistent characters is explored using specific prompts and image uploads.

Leonardo offers two methods for achieving character consistency, with straightforward prompts and fine-tuning models.

Midjourney is favored for generating consistent characters, scoring higher than both of Leonardo's methods.

Midjourney is recommended for those looking for a realistic style and customization, despite its cost.

Leonardo AI is suggested for those interested in creating animations, comic books, or visual novels, offering free access.

The conclusion highlights the strengths of both platforms and suggests choosing based on the specific project needs.